 |
 |
| New York Times -
September 13, 2003 |
List |
| |
| But Who
Says the Heights Have to, Like, Wuther? |
|
No need for
Wuthering. It is just "the Heights."
In the MTV version of Emily Brontė's novel tomorrow night, the
wild moors have been dropped for the cool California coast, and
the patriarch is Earnshaw, a counterculture dropout. The heroine
is called Cate and her older brother, Hindley, is renamed,
rather brilliantly, Hendrix, a hard-partying Goth. Cate's
soulmate is Heath, a soulful rock balladeer (Hendrix sneeringly
calls him Faux-Bro), but Cate is also drawn to Edward and Isabel
Linton, rich and pampered teenagers in a neighboring
Mediterranean McMansion.
In short, the idea behind MTV's version of "Wuthering Heights"
is perfect. Sadly, however, the execution does not quite live up
to the summary. As "Clueless," the 1995 movie adaptation of Jane
Austen's "Emma," proved conclusively, writers can take as much
liberty as they please with a classic as long as they remain
faithful to the spirit of the work.
This version tries too hard to follow the original plot, but
turns the legendary romance into Lovers Lite.
The world did not need another faithful rendition of "Wuthering
Heights," after the Ralph Fiennes and Juliette Binoche version
shown on TNT in 1994. But television should adapt the classics
more liberally, more often. MTV, which two years ago showed a
hip-hop "Carmen" with Beyoncé, would be the logical place for a
Juniorpiece Theater.
Daphne Du Maurier's Gothic romance "Rebecca" could easily be set
in a high school ("Last night I dreamt I went to Manderley
90210"). So could Goethe ("Young Werther Has Issues"). Instead
of mindlessly copying an existing British comedy like
"Coupling," NBC should consider adapting D. H. Lawrence for a
spin-off. ("Sons and Lovers and Friends" Central Perk opens a
branch in Nottinghamshire.)
Hollywood has made some very smart movies by dumbing down the
classics. Besides "Clueless," the 1999 movie "10 Things I Hate
About You," a high-school version of "Taming of the Shrew"
starring Heath Ledger and Julia Stiles, was deliciously
inventive. Even Ethan Hawke's "Hamlet," set in the modern world
the Denmark Corporation, was clever.
"Wuthering Heights" has its moments, especially when
jump-cutting scenes of Heath's rise from squatter to rock star.
Most of the songs were written for the film by Jim Steinman, a
veteran pop composer whose oeuvre includes Meatloaf's "Bat Out
of Hell."
Teenage girls may get a kick out of it, but for a broader
audience it could and should have been better. Brontė's
Catherine and Heathcliff were wilful, tempestuous and not
particularly likable.
Even the static actress Merle Oberon managed to convey her
character's magnificent self-obsession in the 1939 movie
version, which starred Laurence Olivier.
Played by Erika Christensen ("Traffic"), Cate is sweet and
passive, while the Heath of Mike Vogel ("Grounded for Life") is
more whiny than wild. Isabel, played by Katherine Heigl
("Roswell") steals the movie as a sexy, scheming high-school
Alpha girl. (Best moment: Isabel takes Heath to live with her at
a fancy girl's boarding school dorm, where she happens to keep a
small recording studio by her bed.)
The casting is a problem. Both Ms. Christensen and Mr. Vogel are
blond, well fed and even beefy they look less like tormented
lovers than evidence that European fears about American
genetically modified foods may not be entirely groundless.
Mr. Vogel's bland surfer looks make it all the harder for him to
convincingly play a brutish lowlife who embarrasses Cate when
she is with the rich, sophisticated Lintons. In scruffy hair and
faded jeans, he looks as if he belongs there more than she does.
A more nuanced actor with a more smouldering, ethnic look would
have been more persuasive.
Still, even Emily Brontė would not disagree with one of the
lyrics that make Heath a rock superstar: "Maybe you're better
off dead."
Article by Alessandra Stanley |
|
|
|
 |
 |